Will Artificial Intelligence aid the revival of film photography?

Since the inception of photography, photographers have manipulated images to show something different from what they initially captured when pushing the shutter button.

And since Niépce created the first photographic image, the evolution of technology has made it increasingly easy for us to change the original image.

Initially, photographers could only do this in the wet darkroom, with techniques like dodging and burning, hiding parts of the negative or stacking negatives.

Now, in the digital age, after scanning a negative or working directly with a file from a digital camera, photographers can easily remove or add objects, change colors, distort images, add filters to create specific moods, and make a multitude of other changes to the original image.

And while digital photo editing tools have been around for several decades, the latest development in image creation and manipulation is a total game changer: text-to-image Artificial Intelligence (AI).

AI can do more than manipulate an image: it can create a photo without needing an actual subject, using program instructions (not totally accurate, of course: text-to-image AI uses databases with millions of images made of real objects or people).

While still in its infancy, developments are going extremely fast, and we already see AI being used to create photo-like images of portraits, landscapes, food, and pictures in the style of the old masters of painting.

Since photographers using Photoshop already led to controversies, AI has the potential for even more debate.

 What images can we trust?

Digital photography increased the challenge of answering this question because digital photos don't exist: they are only a bunch of specifically arranged zeroes and ones. Not even that: they are bits stored in a magnetic region on a disk or as electrical charges on an SSD.

And while we can ask the trust question regarding any photo altered with editing software, the use of AI to create images out-of-thin-air makes this question even more critical.

Digital photography, as I pointed out in a previous article, still needs a subject that reflects, absorbs, or blocks light to create a picture. Therefore, we still would have that subject against which we can check the 'truthfulness' of the created image. With AI, we don't even have that.

We are entirely at the mercy of the binary gods.

It is probably not without reason that image fact-checking is now a common practice on social media and other communication channels.

Photos created on film, in stark contrast, are tangible from the start.

A roll of film base with a light-sensitive emulsion is exposed to light and then chemically developed, creating a negative film strip you can hold in your hand! And while it is possible to alter that negative (e.g., with markers or acid), it would bear clear evidence.

Therefore, any final image that starts on film, whether printed in a wet darkroom or scanned and edited with photo editing software, is backed up by a negative that provides tangible proof of the image as the photographer initially captured it.

Consequently, I can see the revival of film photography, which has been going on for several years now, becoming even more vital for specific genres. Especially with people for whom the image's truthfulness is critical:

• Crime and other photography that needs 100% proof of not being manipulated;

• Documentary photography and news photography;

• Art collectors;

• Museums and students: to see what the original image was and what the photographer has edited to achieve his vision or message.

Will artists, and other professional and hobby photographers, now flock in swarms back to film photography?

I don't think so.

Digital photography is too far evolved and has too many positive aspects: going back to film will not be practical from a workflow perspective for most photographers.

And while I don't use it, AI, the newest member of the image creation family, is, in my opinion, an excellent development. It is a new tool that has its rightful place in the complete range of visual arts.

Entirely digital art also has found its place in the photography and public art world: look only at the fact that NFTs achieve (sometimes extremely) high price points.

However, like the written proof of authenticity that photographers add to their prints, the tangible film negative could become the new proof of authenticity for those photos that require it.

And as such, the increased digitization of art through AI could be an additional stimulus for photographers in specific genres to go back to film.